| Employment Practices
Liability (EPL) |
|
Employment Practices Liability
coverage protects the insured against damages for events relating to their
workforce, including but not limited to; wrongful termination,
harassment, discrimination,
defamation and unfair hiring/firing
practices. Coverage also provides for defense costs
associated with responding to employment related lawsuits.
In addition to the
increasing legal
obligations employers are
facing while managing their workforces, settlements can have a
significant impact on the company's financial stability,
with the cost to defend against
employment suits, regardless of outcome, being high. The harm that can be caused to a company's
reputation can be irreparable!
|

|
Is adding EPL to your insured's CGL in their best
interest? Four reasons why it might not be:
- When included under the CGL or D&O, some insurers provide a sublimit or will
share limits
- Coverage
is not always as broad with
respect to insureds, wrongful acts, third parties...
-
CGL insurer may not be as experienced in
claims handling
-
Many insurers offer little, if any, management
services
- Any EPL claim experience
developed could impact availability of coverage / pricing of the
balance of the
account
The cost of including it under the CGL or D&O might be lower,
BUT THERE IS A REASON! |
|
|
Highlights of a stand alone policy: |
 |
Broad definition of employees to include leased or
contracted individuals, independent contractors and
applicants for employment |
 |
Full retaliation coverage |
 |
No exclusions for reductions in force |
 |
Loss specifically includes front pay and back pay |
 |
No full wage / hour exclusion |
 |
No intentional acts exclusion |
|
 |
Can your clients afford NOT to have EPL?
Consider this real case: |
|
An executive of a manufacturing company files suit against the
company for wrongful termination and intentional infliction of
emotional distress. The plaintiff, a former Chief
Operating Officer, makes statements that the company improperly
failed to pay employee overtime and terminated the employee for
filing a complaint. The plaintiff alleges that although
the company advised him that his termination was due to
performance problems, he was actually terminated in retaliation
for his honest statements he made in connection with a fellow
employee's termination. Total
DEFENSE COSTS and SETTLEMENT exceeded $750,000! |
"Even
if you win the case,
the cost to defend can be substantial!" |
Get
Application
|
|
866 Ellicott Square Bldg.
| 295 Main Street. | Buffalo | NY
| 14203
1670 Whitehorse - Hamilton Square Road | Hamilton
| NJ | 08690
233 College Highway | Southampton | MA
| 01073
800.333.7226 |
www.RussellBond.com | Fax: 800.677.6779 |
 |
|